Feed-in Tariffs–The Economic Case
There are a number of myths surrounding Feed-in Tariffs (FITs) and how they work because FITs fly in the face of conventional neoliberal economic policy. In conventional neoliberalism, the market sets the price. In FITs, price is set administratively and the market determines the volume. FITs are a market mechanism that can create rapid growth without subsidies and other incentives. Setting prices administratively is nothing new. Electricity prices have been set administratively–and still are–in most countries for a century or more. The links below touch on this and related issues.
Comparison of Feed in Tariff, Quota and Auction Mechanisms to Support Wind Power Development
By
Paul Gipe
CMI Working Paper 70 by Lucy Butler and Karsten Neuhoff, University of Cambridge
Answers to common questions about Renewable Energy Tariffs and Bidding (RFPs)
By
Paul Gipe
Question: An RFP process is more competitive and more efficient – it serves consumers better because it results in …
The Economic Transition to Renewable Energy
By
Dan Ihara, Center For Environmental Economic Development (ceed)
One-page description of how to set the price for a feed-in tariff. . .
Renewable Energy: Political Prices or Political Quotas
By
Frede Hvelplund, Aalborg Universitet
Comparison of the quota system (RPS) to the amount system (Feed-in Tariffs). . .
Political Prices or Political Quantities: A Comparison of Political Support Systems
By
Frede Hvelplund, Aalborg Universitet
A comparison of renewable energy support systems: Quota systems and feed-in tariff systems. . .
Effectiveness through Risk Reduction: A Comparison of the Renewable Obligation in England and Wales and the Feed-In System in Germany
By
Catherine Mitchell
A Comparison of the Renewable Obligation in England and Wales and the Feed-In System in Germany. . .